What should a critique consider according to effective practices?

A critique should encompass both the positive and negative aspects of performance because it provides a holistic view of a student's abilities and areas for improvement. Recognizing good performance encourages and reinforces effective behavior, while identifying bad performance aspects highlights areas that need attention and development. This balanced approach promotes learning by validating what the student is doing well, which can boost confidence, and outlining specific areas where improvement is needed.

Focusing solely on the final outcome of performance neglects the process and the individual efforts that contribute to that outcome. Evaluating how well students follow instructions could overlook other critical elements of performance, such as decision-making or situational awareness. Additionally, comparing students’ performances against each other can lead to unnecessary competition and might not reflect individual progress, which is better assessed through a comprehensive critique. Thus, considering both good and bad performance aspects provides a more constructive framework for teaching and learning.